Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal. 2016. № 1 (17). P. 164—170

 

07.00.00 HISTORICAL SCIENCES AND ARCHEOLOGY

UDC 93+94(100)“1914/19”:316.343.37(47)

Lyubichankovskiy Sergey Valentinovich, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor
Orenburg State Pedagogical University

 

WORLD WAR I AND RUSSIAN PEASANTRY AS A PROBLEM FOR ALL-RUSSIAN DISCUSSION: RECENT HISTORIOGRAPHIC EXPERIENCE

Abstract

This article contains results of the analysis of All-Russian (with the international participation) “round table” discussion devoted to mutual influence of the Russian peasantry and World War I. This scientific forum was held on April 11, 2014 at the RGGU Historical and Archival Institute, and the shorthand report was published in No. 2 New Historical Bulletin in 2014. The main viewpoints of modern historians of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are presented here. The paper emphasizes strong and weak points of the discussion as well as estimates its role in modern Russian historiography.

Key words

World War I, peasantry, historiography.

The full text of the article PDF (Russian)

 

References

1. Materialy diskussii ‘‘Rossiyskaya istoriya: teorii izucheniya i metody prepodavaniya’’ / publ. S. S. Sekirinskogo [Discussion Materials “Russian history: the study of the theory and methods of teaching” / publ. by S. S. Sekirinskii]. Otechestvennaya istoriya, 2008, no. 3, pp. 165-182. (In Russian).
2. Mezhdunarodnyi kruglyi stol ‘‘Russkoe krest’yanstvo i Pervaya mirovaya voina’’ / publ. by P. P. Marcheni, S. Yu. Razina [International Round Table “Russian Peasantry and World War I”]. Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik - The New Historical Bulletin, 2014, no. 2(40), pp. 8-89. Available at: http://www.nivestnik.ru/2014_2/index.shtml. (In Russian).
3. Mestnoe upravlenie v poreformennoi Rossii: mekhanizmy vlasti i ikh effektivnost’. Svodnye materialy zaochnoi diskussii [Local governance in post-Reform Russia: mechanisms of power and efficiency. Summary materials of correspondence discussion]. Yekaterinburg ; Izhevsk : UrO RAS Publ., 2010. 495 p. (In Russian).
4. Khoros V. G. Ponimanie kak osnova istorizma: o knige “Stalinizm i krest’yanstvo” [Comprehension as the Basis of Historicism: About the Book “Stalinism and the Peasantry”]. Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik - The New Historical Bulletin, 2015, no 1 (43), pp. 135-153. (In Russian).
5. Evtuhov C. Kraevedenie Meets the Grand Narrative. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2012, vol. 13, no 4, pp. 877-887.
6. Krinko E. F., Khlynina T. P. Milestones of return of ‘‘forgotten war’’: main trends and stages in the development of domestic historiography of the first world war. Bylye Gody, 2014, no. 33 (3), pp. 296-305.
7. Lyubichankovskiy S. Local Administration in the Reform Era and After: Mechanisms of Authority and their Efficacy in Russia. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2012, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 861-875.
8. Magsumov T. A. Main Approaches to the Study of Historical and Educational Process. Bylye Gody, 2014, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 720-726.
9. Schattenberg S. Max Weber in the Provinces. Measuring Imperial Russia by Modern Standards. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2012, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 889-902.
10. Weisensel P. Mestnoe upravlenie v poreformennoi Rossii: Mekhanizmy vlasti i ikh effektivnost’: Svodnye materialy zaochnoi diskussii. Slavic Review, 2012, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 176-178.