Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal. 2018. № 2(26). P. 304—312
13.00.00 PEDAGOGIC SCIENCES
UDC 37.013
Chetvertnykh Tatiana Vladimirovna, Postgraduate student
Omsk State Pedagogical University
FORMATIVE EVALUATION AND ITS IMPACT ON PERSONAL EDUCATIONAL RESULTS OF STUDENTS
Abstract
The article analyzes the approaches to determining the essence of formative evaluation and presents the results of the analysis. The philosophical foundations of formative evaluation are revealed; it is compared with a cumulative assessment. Based on the content analysis of contemporary foreign and domestic scientific works, the paper reveals the features of this type of evaluation through which it affects the personal educational outcomes of students. The systematic analysis of the main techniques and methods of formative evaluation at school allowed the author to define the functions of the formative evaluation, contributing to the achievement of students’ personal results. The interiorization mechanism of the content of education by a student is substantiated through formative evaluation.
Key words
Formative evaluation, cumulative assessment, current evaluation, educational content, personal educational results.
1. Boitsova E. G. Formiruyushchee otsenivanie obrazovatel’nykh rezul’tatov uchashchikhsya v sovremennoi shkole [Formative assessment of educational outcomes of students in a modern school]. Chelovek i obrazovanie, 2014, no. 1, pp. 171—175. (In Russian)
2. Bogdanova V. O. Konstruktivistskie idei v pedagogike: ot adaptatsii k svobode [Constructivist ideas in pedagogy: from adaptation to freedom]. Pedagogicheskii zhurnal, 2012, no. 2—3, pp. 23—38. (In Russian)
3. Vilkova L. V. Kachestvo shkol’nogo inoyazychnogo obrazovaniya: formiruyushchee otsenivanie [Quality of school education in other languages: formative assessment]. Diskussiya, 2014, no. 6 (47), pp. 76—80. (In Russian)
4. Vilkova L. V. Analiz ponyatiya “otsenka” v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh [Analysis of the concept of “evaluation” in psychological and pedagogical studies]. Problemy teorii i praktiki podgotovki sovremennogo spetsialista: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. s mezhdunar. uchastiem [Problems of theory and practice of training a modern specialist: inter-university collection of scientific works with intern. participation]. N. Novgorod, NGLU im. N. A. Dobrolyubova Publ., 2011, is. 13, pp. 68—71. (In Russian)
5. Vilkova L. V. Retrospektivnyi analiz modelei otsenki kachestva shkol’nogo obrazovaniya [Retrospective analysis of models for assessing the quality of school education]. International scientific journal “Global Science Communications”, 2012, no. 4 (17): matters of International Scientific Internet Conference “Prospects for the development of modern science” (Kazakhstan, September 10—16, 2012). Almaty, Kazakhstan, Cranendonck 2 5673 LA, 2012, pp. 63—68. (In Russian)
6. Vilkova L. V. Elementy formiruyushchei otsenki kachestva shkol’nogo obrazovaniya [Elements of the formative assessment of the quality of school education]. Molodoi uchenyi, 2012, no. 11 (46), pp. 401—403. (In Russian)
7. Vitushkina E. V., Kruzhilina T. V. Osobennosti formirovaniya samootsenki mladshikh shkol’nikov kak osnovy dostizheniya lichnostnogo rezul’tata obrazovaniya [Features of the formation of self-esteem of junior schoolchildren as the basis for achieving the personal educational result]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2014, no. 1, pp. 72—83. (In Russian)
8. Vitushkina E. V. Pedagogicheskie usloviya formirovaniya differentsirovannoi samootsenki mladshikh shkol’nikov [Pedagogical conditions for the formation of differentiated self-esteem of junior schoolchildren]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Pedagogicheskie nauki, 2014, no. 1, pp. 81—87. (In Russian)
9. Zemlyanskaya E. N. Formiruyushchee otsenivanie (otsenka dlya obucheniya) obrazovatel’nykh dostizhenii obuchayushchikhsya [Formative assessment (assessment of learning) of students’ educational achievements]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya, 2016, no. 3, pp. 50—58. (In Russian)
10. Komarov A. I. Logika i pedagogika [Logic and pedagogy]. Pedagogicheskoe myshlenie: napravleniya, problemy, poiski [Pedagogical thinking: directions, problems, searches]. Moscow, Russkoe slovo Publ., 2015, pp. 39—61. (In Russian)
11. Lerner I. Ya. Uchebnyi predmet, tema, urok [Subject, topic, lesson]. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 1988. 80 p. (In Russian)
12. Lobastov G. V. Filosofiya i lichnost’ [Philosophy and personality]. Pedagogicheskoe myshlenie: napravleniya, problemy, poiski [Pedagogical thinking: directions, problems, searches]. Moscow, Russkoe slovo Publ., 2015, pp. 10—39. (In Russian)
13. Logvina I., Rozhdestvenskaya L. Instrumenty formiruyushchego otsenivaniya v deyatel’nosti uchitelya-predmetnika [Techniques to form the assessment in the activity of the subject teacher]. Narva, Tartu Ülikooli Publ., 2012. 48 p. (In Russian)
14. Mikhailova E. K. Sovremennye podkhody k otsenivaniyu uchebnykh dostizhenii shkol’nikov [Modern approaches to assessing the educational achievements of schoolchildren]. V mire nauchnykh otkrytii, 2012, no. 9.2, pp. 328—341. (In Russian)
15. Mikhailova E. K. Obespechenie kachestva obucheniya shkol’nikov kak pedagogicheskaya problema [Ensuring the quality of teaching students as a pedagogical problem]. Sovremennye innovatsionnye tekhnologii v shkol’nom obrazovanii [Modern innovative technologies in school education]. Krasnoyarsk, Nauchno-innovatsionnyi tsentr Publ., 2012, pp. 77—102. (In Russian)
16. Pinskaya M. A. Formiruyushchee otsenivanie: otsenivanie v klasse [Formative assessment: assessment in the classroom]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2010. 264 p. (In Russian)
17. Federal’nyi gosudarstvennyi obrazovatel’nyi standart osnovnogo obshchego obrazovaniya (utverzhden prikazom Minobrnauki Rossii ot 17.12.2010 № 1897, v redaktsii prikazov Minobrnauki Rossii ot 29.10.2014 № 1644, ot 31.12.2015 № 1577) [The federal state educational standard of basic general education (approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia of 17.12.2010 № 1897, in the version of orders of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia of 29.10.2014 № 1644, of December 31, 2015 № 1577)]. Available at: http://минобрнауки.рф/документы/938/. Accessed: 12.10.2017. (In Russian)
18. Fishman I. S. Formiruyushchaya otsenka obrazovatel’nykh rezul’tatov uchashchikhsya [Formative evaluation of educational outcomes of students]. Moscow, Uchebnaya literature Publ., 2007. 244 p. (In Russian)
19. Shakirov R. Kh., Burkitova A. A., Dudkina O. I. Otsenivanie uchebnykh dostizhenii uchashchikhsya: metod. rukovodstvo [Evaluation of students’ learning achievements: method. manual]. Bishkek, Bilim Publ., 2012. 80 p. (In Russian)
20. Assessment for Learning — 10 principles. Available at: https://www.aaia.org.uk/blog/2010/06/16/assessment-reform-group/. Accessed: 26.10.2017.
21. Black P., Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 2009, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5—31.
22. Black P., Wiliam D. Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning. Oxford, 2008. 135 р.
23. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D. Working inside the black box: assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 2004, vol. 86 (1), pp. 8—21.
24. Clark I. Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 2012, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 205—249.
25. Loevinger J. Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories. San-Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1976. 232 р.
26. Shepard L. A. Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. The future of assessment: shaping teaching and learning: ETS Conference. New York, 2005. 37 p.
27. Formative assessment: Guidance for early childhood policymakers. Available at: http://ceelo.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/04/ceelo_policy_report_formative_assessment.pdf. Accessed: 29.10.2017.
Bibliography link to this article:
Chetvertnykh T. V. Formative evaluation and its impact on personal educational results of students. Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal, 2018, no. 2 (26), pp. 304—312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32516/2303-9922.2018.26.21.