Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal. 2021. № 2(38). P. 61—70
03.00.00 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
UDC 574.3:572.21
Popov Petr Petrovich, Doctor of Biological Sciences
Institute of North Development Problems, Tyumen Scientific Center, SB RAS Arefyev Stanislav Pavlovich, Doctor of Biological Sciences
Institute of North Development Problems, Tyumen Scientific Center, SB RAS Kazantseva Mariya Nikolaevna,Candidate of Biological Sciences
Institute of North Development Problems, Tyumen Scientific Center, SB RASI
DIVERSITY AND GEOGRAPHIC DIFFERENTIATION OF SIBERIAN SPRUCE (Picea obovata) POPULATIONS IN THE RUSSIAN PART OF THE RANGE
Abstract
Populations of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) in the Russian part of its range were studied by biometric indicators of the main systematic features — the shape of seed scales and the length of cones. All populations are divided into three significantly different groups (population phenotypes), the designations of which take into account the occurrence in them of individuals with the phenotype of spruce of European (e — europaea), Siberian (s — sibirica), and intermediate form (m — medioxima): f. P.ms. — phenotype Picea medioxima-sibirica; f. P.mss. — phenotype Picea medioxima-sibirica-sibirica; f. P.s. — phenotype Picea sibirica. The population structure was studied on the basis of the following gradation of phenotypes of individuals: European spruce (f. e, f. eem, f. em), intermediate form (f. emm, f. m, f. mms), Siberian spruce (f. ms, f. mss, f. s). In the population group of f. P.ms. there are 7 phenotypes of individuals with a predominance of f. mms (21%), f. ms (32%) and f. mss (24%); in the group of f. P.mss. — 5 phenotypes of individuals with a predominance of f.ms. (23), f. mss (36%), f. s (31%), in the group of f. P.s.— 3 phenotypes of individuals with a predominance of f. mss (28%) and f. s (64%). Intermediate phenotypes of individuals are found only in populations of f. P.ms. (33%) and f. P.mss. (10%). In all the considered groups of populations, there are practically no individuals of the European Spruce phenotypes. The diversity coefficients in terms of frequency of phenotypes of individuals in the identified groups of populations are 5.78 (4.23—6.75), 4.30 (2.93—5.05), and 2.87 (1.93—3.70) respectively. There is a significant correlation between the frequency of phenotypes of individuals and the average length of cones. Taking into account the relationship of these parameters with the quantity and quality of seeds, the results of the study can be useful for solving forestry issues in the selection of the most promising sites as genetic reserves.
Key words
Form of seed scales, phenotype, plant specimen, population.
1. Atlas lesov SSSR [Atlas of the USSR forests]. Moscow, GUGK Publ., 1973. 222 p. (In Russian)
2. Bobrov E. G. Ob osobennosti flory erraticheskoi oblasti (odin iz putei formoobrazovaniya) [On specific features of the flora of an erratic region (One of pathways in the development of forms)]. Sovetskaya botanika, 1944, no. 2, pp. 3—20. (In Russian)
3. Bobrov E. G. Introgressivnaya gibridizatsiya v rode Picea A. Dietr. [Introgressive Hybridization in the Genus Picea A. Dietr.]. Trudy Instituta rastenii i zhivotnykh UNTs AN SSSR, 1974, is. 90, pp. 60—66. (In Russian)
4. Borovikov V. P. Populyarnoe vvedenie v programmu STATISTICA [Popular Introduction to the STATISTICA program]. Moscow, Komp’yuterPress Publ., 1998. 267 p. (In Russian)
5. Vol’f E. Khvoinye derev’ya i kustarniki evropeiskoi i aziatskoi chasti SSSR [Conifer trees and shrubs in the European and Asian parts of the Soviet Union]. Leningrad, Leningr. lesn. in-t Publ., 1925. 173 p. (In Russian)
6. Gasheva N. A., Mukanova A. A. Struktura izmenchivosti radikal’nykh priznakov eli sibirskoi [The structure of variation in radical characters of Siberian spruce]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Estestvennye nauki [Collection of scientific papers. Natural sciences]. Surgut, Surgutskii gosudarstvennyi universitet KhMAO Publ., 2003, is. 12, pp. 31—40. (In Russian)
7. Govorin G. M. Izmenchivost’ eli sibirskoi v basseine Eniseya [Variability of Siberian spruce in the Yenisey basin]. Lesovedenie, 1992, no. 5, pp. 56—60. (In Russian)
8. Golubets M. A. Sovremennaya traktovka ob’’ema vida Picea abies (L.) Karst. i ego vnutrividovykh taksonov [Modern interpretation of the volumes of the species Picea abies (L.) Karst. and its intraspecific taxa]. Botanicheskii zhurnal, 1968, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1048—1062. (In Russian)
9. Goncharenko G. G., Padutov V. E. Populyatsionnaya i evolyutsionnaya genetika elei Palearktiki [Population and evolutionary genetics of Palearctic spruce species]. Gomel, IL NANB Publ., 2001. 197 p. (In Russian)
10. Danilov D. N. Izmenchivost’ semennykh cheshui Picea excelsa [Variation of Seed Scales in Picea excelsa]. Botanicheskii zhurnal, 1943, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 191—202. (In Russian)
11. Zhivotovskii L. A. Pokazateli populyatsionnoi izmenchivosti po polimorfnym priznakam [Indices of population variation in polymorphic characters]. Fenetika populyatsii [Population phenetics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982, pp. 38—45. (In Russian)
12. Zakharova K. V., Seits K. S. Vnutripopulyatsionnaya fenotipicheskaya differentsiatsiya gibridnykh populyatsii Picea abies × Picea obovate (Pinaceae) v kontrastnykh ekotopicheskikh usloviyakh [The intrapopulation phenotypic diversity of the Picea abies × Picea obovata (Pinaceae) hybrid populations in contrast environmental conditions]. Botanicheskii zhurnal, 2011, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 709—738. (In Russian)
13. Kazantseva M. N., Aref’ev S. P., Popov P. P. Individual’naya i geograficheskaya izmenchivost’ shishek i formy semennykh cheshui eli sibirskoi v sibirskoi chasti areala [Individual and geographic variability of cones and seed scale forms of Siberian spruce in the Siberian part of the range]. Lesovedenie — Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2019, no. 3, pp. 198—207. (In Russian)
14. Koropachinskii I. Yu., Milyutin L. I. Estestvennaya gibridizatsiya drevesnykh rastenii [Natural hybridization of woody plants]. Novosibirsk, Geo Publ., 2006. 223 p. (In Russian)
15. Koropachinskii I. Yu., Potemkin O. N., Rudikovskii A. V., Kuznetsova E. V. Polimorfizm i struktura populyatsii eli sibirskoi (Picea obovata Ledeb.) na severnom predele rasprostraneniya vida [Polymorphism and structure of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) populations at the northern limits of the species distribution]. Sibirskii ekologicheskii zhurnal — Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2012, no. 2, pp. 175—184. (In Russian)
16. Milyutin L. I. O taksonomicheskom statuse i vnutrividovoi izmenchivosti eli sibirskoi (Picea obovata) [On the taxonomic status and intraspecific variability of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata)]. Botanicheskii zhurnal, 2015, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 33—38. (In Russian)
17. Orlova L. V. K sistematike i geograficheskomu rasprostraneniyu elei (Picea) Zapadnoi Sibiri [To the taxonomy and geographical of spruces (Picea) in Western Siberia]. Botanika v sovremennom mire. Trudy XIV s’’ezda russkogo botanicheskogo obshchestva i konferentsii [Botany in the modern world. Proceed. of the XIV Congress of the Russian Botanical Society and Conference]. Makhachkala, Dagestanskii NTs RAN Publ., 2018, pp. 77—80. (In Russian)
18. Popov P. P. El’ na vostoke Evropy i v Zapadnoi Sibiri: Populyatsionno-geograficheskaya izmenchivost’ i ee lesovodstvennoe znachenie [Spruce in Eastern Europe and Western Siberia: population-geographical variability and its silvicultural significance]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1999. 169 p. (In Russian)
19. Popov P. P. El’ evropeiskaya i sibirskaya: struktura, intergradatsiya i differentsiatsiya populyatsionnykh sistem [European and Siberian spruce: structure, intergradation and differentiation of population systems]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2005. 231 p. (In Russian)
20. Popov P. P. Populyatsionno-geograficheskaya izmenchivost’ shishek eli evropeiskoi i sibirskoi [Population-geographical variability of Norway spruce and Siberian spruce cones]. Lesovedenie, 2011, no. 5, pp. 54—60. (In Russian)
21. Popov P. P. Fenotipicheskaya struktura populyatsii Picea abies i P. obovata (Pinaceae) na vostoke Evropy [Phenotypic structure of Picea abies and P. obovata (Pinaceae) populations in the Eastern Europe]. Botanicheskii zhurnal, 2013, vol. 98, no. 11, pp. 1384—1402. (In Russian)
22. Popov P. P. Rasprostranenie osobei promezhutochnoi formy v populyatsiyakh elei evropeiskoi i sibirskoi [The distribution of individuals of intermediate form in the populations of Norway and Siberian spruces]. Sibirskii lesnoi zhurnal, 2018, no. 4, pp. 13—19. (In Russian)
23. Popov P. P. Rasprostranenie populyatsii promezhutochnoi formy elei evropeiskoi i sibirskoi v rossiiskoi chasti areala [Distribution of intermediate populations of the European and Siberian spruces in the Russian part of the area]. Lesokhozyaistvennaya informatsiya: elektronnyi setevoi zhurnal — Forestry Information, 2020, no. 1, pp. 69—75. DOI: 10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2020.1.07. (In Russian)
24. Popov P. P., Aref’ev S. P., Gasheva N. A., Kazantseva M. N. Geograficheskaya izmenchivost’ i fenotipicheskaya struktura populyatsii Picea obovata (Pinaceae) v Zapadnoi Sibiri [Geographic variability and phenotypic structure of Picea obovata (Pinaceae) populations in the Western Siberia]. Botanicheskii zhurnal, 2015, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 927—938. (In Russian)
25. Popov P. P., Aref’ev S. P., Kazantseva M. N. Fenotipicheskaya struktura populyatsii eli nekotorykh osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii na vostoke Evropy i v Sibiri [Phenotypic diversity of spruce populations in some protected areas in Eastern Europe and Siberia]. Zapovednaya nauka — Nature Conservation Research, 2019, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 26—33. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2019.060. (In Russian)
26. Pravdin L. F. El’ evropeiskaya i el’ sibirskaya v SSSR [Norway spruce and Siberian spruce in the Soviet Union]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1975. 200 p. (In Russian)
27. Romeder E., Shenbakh G. Genetika i selektsiya lesnykh porod [Genetics and selection of forest species]. Moscow, Sel’khozizdat Publ., 1962. 268 p. (In Russian)
28. Ryzhova N. V., Shutov V. V., Korenev I. A., Malyshev V. A., Lebedev O. Yu. Morfologiya shishek i produktivnost’ eli v Kostromskoi oblasti [Morphology of cones and productivity of spruce in Kostroma oblast]. Lesovedenie — Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2003, no. 5, pp. 61—64. (In Russian)
29. Sokolov S. Ya., Svyazeva O. S., Kubli V. A. Arealy derev’ev i kustarnikov SSSR [The ranges of tree and shrub species in the Soviet Union]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1977. 163 p. (In Russian)
30. Tarkhanov S. N. Populyatsionnaya izmenchivost’ eli finskoi po forme semennykh cheshui na severe Arkhangel’skoi oblasti [Population variability of Finnish spruce from the seed scale forms in northern Arkhangelsk oblast]. Lesovedenie — Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2019, no. 3, pp. 208—214. DOI: 10.1134/S0024114819020116. (In Russian)
31. Teploukhov F. A. Izvestiya o deyatel’nosti Lesnogo obshchestva [News of the activities of the Forest Society]. Lesnoi zhurnal, 1872, is. 6, pp. 86—91. (In Russian)
32. Fedorovich F. Novye nablyudeniya nad sibirskoi el’yu (Picea obovata Ledeb.) [New observations of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.)]. Lesnoi zhurnal, 1876, is. 1, pp. 15—26. (In Russian)
33. Holubčik M. Dedivost rozmerov šišiek a výhy semena smreka obyčajného (Picea abies Karst). Čas. Slezsk. muz., 1973, no. 1, s. 77—87.
34. Khalil M. A. K. Genetics of cone morphology of Black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) in Newfoundland, Canada. Silvae Genetica, 1984, vol. 33, no. 4/5, pp. 101—109.
35. Krutovskii K. V., Bergmann F. Introgressive hybridization and phylogenetic relationships between Norway, Picea abies (L.) Karst., and Siberian, P. obovata Ledeb., spruce species studied by isozyme loci. Heredity, 1995, vol. 74, pp. 464—480.
36. Popov P. P. Reference populations for discriminant analysis in the continuous range of Norway and Siberian spruces. Russian Journal of Ecology, 2012, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 13—18. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413612010092.
37. Popov P. P. Population structure in European and Siberian spruces according to their phenotypes. Russian Journal of Ecology, 2017, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 403—408. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413617050101.
38. Schmidt Vogt H. Studien zur morphologischen Variabilität der Fichte (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). 3. Der gegenwärtige Stand der Forschung zur morphologischen Variabilität der Fichte Gesetzmäßigkeiten und Theorien. Allgemeine Forst — und Jagdzeitung, 1972, Bd. 143, Ht. 11, S. 221—240.
39. Teplouchoff Th. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Sibirischen Fichte — Picea obovata Ledeb. Bulletin de la Société impériale des naturalistes de Moscou, 1868, Bd. 41, Ht. 3, S. 244—252.
Bibliography link to this article:
Popov P. P., Arefyev S. P., Kazantseva M. N. Diversity and geographic differentiation of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata) populations in the Russian part of the range. Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal, 2021, no. 2 (38), pp. 61—70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32516/2303-9922.2021.38.5.