<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Оренбургского государственного педагогического университета. Электронный научный журнал</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2303-9922</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32516/2303-9922.2026.57.2</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Other</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Влияние режимов заповедования на состояние лугов Приобской лесостепи</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Impact of Land Conservation Regimes on the Health of Meadows in the Ob Forest-Steppe</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зверева</surname><given-names>Галина Кимовна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zvereva</surname><given-names>Galina K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/><email>labspp@yandex.ru</email><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6282-8688</contrib-id></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University</institution><city xml:lang="en">Novosibirsk</city><country xml:lang="en">Russia</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Siberian Federal Scientific Center of Agro-Bio Technologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><city xml:lang="en">Krasnoobsk, Novosibirsk region</city><country xml:lang="en">Russia</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Новосибирский государственный педагогический университет</institution><city xml:lang="ru">Новосибирск</city><country xml:lang="ru">Россия</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff4"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Сибирский федеральный научный центр агробиотехнологий Российской академии наук</institution><city xml:lang="ru">Краснообск, Новосибирская область</city><country xml:lang="ru">Россия</country></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-03-25"><day>25</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><issue>1(57)</issue><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>41</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-11-02"><day>02</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-02-20"><day>20</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:title="CC BY 4.0"><ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p xml:lang="ru">CC BY 4.0</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestospu.ru/archive/2026/articles/57/2_1_2026.html" xlink:title="https://www.vestospu.ru/archive/2026/articles/57/2_1_2026.html">https://www.vestospu.ru/archive/2026/articles/57/2_1_2026.html</self-uri><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="publication-87dbcc22-9833-48a4-9be2-95e520182df9.pdf" xlink:title="PDF"/><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье проведено сопоставление состояния растительности и динамики надземной фитомассы луговых сообществ Приобской лесостепи при разных режимах заповедования. Исследования проведены в Новосибирской области на примере пяти луговых ценозов, ранее использовавшихся под пастбища и сенокосы. Рассмотрено влияние абсолютного заповедования в течение 6—12 лет, а также изоляции травостоя при наличии нерегулярных весенних палов в течение 16 лет. Определение запасов надземной фитомассы и описание растительности проведено согласно общепринятым методикам. Абсолютное заповедование деградированных пастбищных сообществ в течение 2—4 лет способствует резкому возрастанию надземной фитомассы в основном за счет разрастания дигрессионно устойчивых злаков. При заповедовании деградированных луговых ценозов в течение 16 лет с наличием весенних палов в отдельные сезоны надземная масса возрастает в 1,4—3,6 раза за счет увеличения общего проективного покрытия, видового разнообразия и высоты растений. При отсутствии первоначальной деградации абсолютное заповедование лугов в течение 7—12 лет приводит к возрастанию надземной мортмассы в 1,8—8,4 раза, которое сопровождается снижением массы зеленых побегов в 1,5—3,4 раза, уменьшением и неравномерностью проективного покрытия, при этом особенно резко сокращается участие бобовых трав.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="summary"><p>The article compares the vegetation status and the aboveground phytomass dynamics of meadow communities in the Ob forest-steppe under various land conservation regimes. The study was conducted in the Novosibirsk Region using five meadow communities previously used for pastures and hayfields. It examined the impact of absolute land conservation for 6—12 years and grass stand isolation with irregular spring fires for 16 years. The determination of aboveground phytomass reserves and vegetation description were carried out according to generally accepted methods. Absolute conservation of degraded pasture communities for 2—4 years promotes a sharp increase in aboveground phytomass, mainly due to the growth of degradation-resistant grasses. When degraded meadow communities are preserved for 16 years with spring burning in certain seasons, the aboveground mass increases by 1.4—3.6 times due to an increase in the total projective cover, species diversity, and plant height. In the absence of initial degradation, absolute conservation of meadows for 7—12 years leads to an increase in aboveground mortmass by 1.8—8.4 times, which is accompanied by a decrease in the mass of green shoots by 1.5—3.4 times, a decrease and unevenness of the projective cover, while the participation of leguminous grasses is significantly reduced.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Приобская лесостепь</kwd><kwd>заповедование</kwd><kwd>пастбищная дигрессия</kwd><kwd>структура и запасы надземной фитомассы</kwd><kwd>весенние палы</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Ob forest-steppe</kwd><kwd>meadow сonservation</kwd><kwd>pasture digression</kwd><kwd>structure and reserves of aboveground phytomass</kwd><kwd>spring fires</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">1. Базилевич Н. И. Биологическая продуктивность экосистем Северной Евразии. M. : Наука, 1993. 293 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">2. Белякова О. И. Многолетняя динамика разложения растительного опада в основных экосистемах Центральной лесостепи : автореф. дис. … канд. биол. наук. Воронеж, 2001. 15 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">3. Горшкова А. А. Основные черты пастбищной дигрессии в степных сообществах Сибири // Сибирский вестник сельскохозяйственной науки. 1983. № 4. С. 51—54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">4. Дубынина С. С. Продуктивность фитомассы луговых растительных сообществ Назаровской котловины при разных режимах использования // Успехи современного естествознания. 2018. № 10. С. 102—107. DOI: 10.17513/use.36890.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">5. Евстигнеев О. И. Влажные луга и заповедный режим (на примере заповедника «Брянский лес») // Изучение и охрана биологического разнообразия Брянской области. Материалы по ведению Красной книги Брянской области. Брянск, 2012. Вып. 7. С. 40—49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">6. Елумеева Т. Г., Гаврилова Т. М., Бородулина В. П., Чередниченко О. В. Фитомасса и температура почвы травяных сообществ Центрально-Лесного заповедника // Сибирский экологический журнал. 2024. № 6. С. 1019—1029. DOI: 10.15372/SEJ20240615.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">7. Ершова Э. А. Антропогенная динамика растительности юга Средней Сибири : препринт. Новосибирск, 1995. 53 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">8. Зверева Г. К. Влияние длительного заповедования на растительность деградированных пастбищных фитоценозов Приобской лесостепи // Ученые записки Забайкальского государственного университета. Сер. Естественные науки. 2014. № 1 (54). C. 44—52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">9. Зверева Г. К. Динамика надземной фитомассы в сообществах Приобской лесостепи и Северной Кулунды при заповедовании // Проблемы ботаники Южной Сибири и Монголии. 2022. Т. 21, № 1. С. 81—85. DOI: 10.14258/pbssm.2022017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">10. Зверева Г. К. Постпастбищная демутация в сообществах Приобской лесостепи // Сибирский экологический журнал. 2009. № 5. С. 657—664.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">11. Макаревич В. Н. Влияние на луговой травостой способов его использования // Труды Ботанического института имени В. Л. Комарова Академии наук СССР. Сер. 3, Геоботаника. 1963. Вып. 14. С. 39—103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">12. Макаревич В. Н. Об изучении прироста и опада надземной части луговых растительных сообществ // Ботанический журнал. 1968. Т. 53, № 8. С. 1160—1169.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">13. Макаревич В. Н., Джалилова А. О., Игнатенко И. В., Кириллова В. П., Скалон И. С. Экспериментальное изучение реакции лугового сообщества на различные формы воздействия (важнейшие итоги) // Проблемы ботаники. 1968. Т. 10. С. 193—213.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">14. Онипченко В. Г., Бостанова Ф. С., Токарева О. А., Макаров М. И., Елумеева Т. Г., Ахметжанова А. А., Текеев Д. К., Малышева Т. И., Кадулин М. С. Влияние выжигания ветоши на альпийские пестроовсяницевые луга Северо-Западного Кавказа // Журнал общей биологии. 2023. Т. 84, № 4. С. 313—326. DOI: 10.31857/S004445962304005X.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">15. Понятовская В. М. Учет обилия и особенности размещения видов в естественных растительных сообществах // Полевая геоботаника / ред. А. А. Корчагин, Е. М. Лавренко. М. ; Л. : Наука, 1964. Т. 3. С. 209—289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">16. Ронгинская А. В. Динамические процессы в луговых фитоценозах. Новосибирск : Наука, 1988. 160 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">17. Семенова-Тян-Шанская А. М. Накопление и роль подстилки в травяных сообществах. Л. : Наука, 1977. 191 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">18. Снегирева Е. В. Динамика состава и продуктивности растений при разных режимах заповедования луговой степи // Динамика биоты в экосистемах Центральной лесостепи. М. : АН СССР, 1986. С. 185—199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">19. Тиходеева М. Ю., Лебедева В. Х., Панфиловская К. А. Классификация типов зарастания суходольных лугов // Сборник научных трудов Государственного Никитского ботанического сада. 2016. Т. 143. С. 242—248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">20. Bonanomi G., Idbella M., Abd-ElGawad A. M., Motti R., Ippolito F., Santorufo L., Adamo P., Agrelli D., De Marco A., Maisto G., Zotti M. Impact of prescribed burning, mowing and abandonment on a Mediterranean grassland: A 5-year multi-kingdom comparison // The Science of the Total Environment. 2022. Vol. 834, N 4. Art. 155442. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155442.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">21. Cherednichenko O., Borodulina V. Biodiversity of herbaceous vegetation in abandoned and managed sites under protection regime: a case study in the Central Forest Reserve, NW Russia // Hacquetia. 2018. Vol. 17, N 1. P. 35—59. DOI: 10.1515/hacq-2017-0015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">22. Cherednichenko O. V., Gavrilova T., Borodulina V., Zhelezova S., Elumeeva T. G. Structure of aboveground phytomass of abandoned and managed mesic meadows in the forest zone: a case study from the Central Forest Reserve, Russia // Botany Letters. 2021. Vol. 168. P. 297—309. DOI: 10.1080/23818107.2021.1884899.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">23. Hansson M., Fogelfors H. Management of a semi-natural grassland; results from a 15-year-old experiment in southern Sweden // Journal of Vegetation Science. 2000. Vol. 11, N 1. P. 31—38. DOI: 10.2307/3236772.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">24. Jernej I., Bohner A., Walcher R., Hussain R. I., Arnberger A., Zaller J. G., Frank T. Impact of land-use change in mountain semi-dry meadows on plants, litter decomposition and earthworms // Web Ecology. 2019. Vol. 19, N 2. P. 53—63. DOI: 10.5194/we-19-53-2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">25. Lednev S., Semenkov I., Koroleva T. Comparison on effect of mowing and spring burning on the occurrence of grassland plants in Western Siberia (preliminary results) // E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. Vol. 463. N 02017. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202346302017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">26. Losvik M. H. Plant species diversity in an old, traditionally managed hay meadow compared to abandoned hay meadows in Southwest Norway // Nordic Journal of Botany. 1999. Vol. 19, N 4. P. 473—487. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1999.tb01231.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">27. Öckinger E., Eriksson A. K., Smith H. G. Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants // Biological Conservation. 2006. Vol. 133, N 3. P. 291—300. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">28. Pruchniewicz D. Abandonment of traditionally managed mesic mountain meadows affects plant species composition and diversity // Basic and Applied Ecology. 2017. Vol. 20. P. 10—18. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.01.006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">29. Vassilev K., Pedashenko H., Nikolov S. C., Apostolova I., Dengler J. Effect of land abandonment on the vegetation of upland semi-natural grasslands in the Western Balkan Mts., Bulgaria // Plant Biosystems. 2011. Vol. 145, N 3. P. 654—665. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2011.601337.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">30. Wahlman H., Milberg P. Management of semi-natural grassland vegetation: evaluation of a long-term experiment in southern Sweden // Annales Botanici Fennici. 2002. Vol. 39. P. 159—166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">31. World Flora Online. URL: http://www.worldfloraonline.org/ (дата обращения: 01.10.2025)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">1. Bazilevich N. I. Biologicheskaya produktivnost’ ekosistem Severnoi Evrazii [Biological productivity of ecosystems in Northern Eurasia]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993. 293 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">2. Belyakova O. I. Mnogoletnyaya dinamika razlozheniya rastitel’nogo opada v osnovnykh ekosistemakh Tsentral’noi lesostepi: avtoref. dis. … kand. biol. nauk [Long-term dynamics of decomposition of plant litter in the main ecosystems of the Central forest-steppe. Abstr. Cand. Dis.]. Voronezh, 2001. 15 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">3. Gorshkova A. A. Osnovnye cherty pastbishchnoi digressii v stepnykh soobshchestvakh Sibiri [The main features of pasture digression in the steppe communities of Siberia]. Sibirskii vestnik sel’skokhozyaistvennoi nauki, 1983, no. 4, pp. 51—54. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">4. Dubynina S. S. Produktivnost’ fitomassy lugovykh rastitel’nykh soobshchestv Nazarovskoi kotloviny pri raznykh rezhimakh ispol’zovaniya [The productivity of the phytomass of meadow plant communities of the Nazarovskaya basin under different conditions of use]. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya — Advances in Current Natural Sciences, 2018, no. 10, pp. 102—107. DOI: 10.17513/use.36890. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">5. Evstigneev O. I. Vlazhnye luga i zapovednyi rezhim (na primere zapovednika “Bryanskii les”) [Wet meadows and protected areas (using the Bryansk Forest Nature Reserve as an example)]. Izuchenie i okhrana biologicheskogo raznoobraziya Bryanskoi oblasti. Materialy po vedeniyu Krasnoi knigi Bryanskoi oblasti [Study and protection of biological diversity in the Bryansk region. Materials for maintaining the Red Data Book of the Bryansk region]. Bryansk, 2012, is. 7, pp. 40—49. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">6. Elumeeva T. G., Gavrilova T. M., Borodulina V. P., Cherednichenko O. V. Fitomassa i temperatura pochvy travyanykh soobshchestv Tsentral’no-Lesnogo zapovednika [Phytomass and soil temperature in herbaceous communities of the Central Forest Reserve]. Sibirskii ekologicheskii zhurnal — Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2024, no. 6, pp. 1019—1029. DOI: 10.15372/SEJ20240615. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">7. Ershova E. A. Antropogennaya dinamika rastitel’nosti yuga Srednei Sibiri: preprint [Anthropogenic dynamics of vegetation in the south of Central Siberia. Preprint]. Novosibirsk, 1995. 53 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref39"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">8. Zvereva G. K. Vliyanie dlitel’nogo zapovedovaniya na rastitel’nost’ degradirovannykh pastbishchnykh fitotsenozov Priobskoi lesostepi [Influence of long protective regime on the vegetation of degraded pasture phytocenosis of the Ob forest-steppe]. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Estestvennye nauki, 2014, no. 1 (54), pp. 44—52. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref40"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">9. Zvereva G. K. Dinamika nadzemnoi fitomassy v soobshchestvakh Priobskoi lesostepi i Severnoi Kulundy pri zapovedovanii [Dynamics of aboveground phytomass in the communities of the Ob River forest-steppe and Northern Kulunda during protective regime]. Problemy botaniki Yuzhnoi Sibiri i Mongolii — Problems of Botany of South Siberia and Mongolia, 2022, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 81—85. DOI: 10.14258/pbssm.2022017. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref41"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">10. Zvereva G. K. Postpastbishchnaya demutatsiya v soobshchestvakh Priobskoi lesostepi [Post-pasture demutation in the communities of forest-steppe near the Ob river]. Sibirskii ekologicheskii zhurnal — Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2009, no. 5, pp. 657—664. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref42"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">11. Makarevich V. N. Vliyanie na lugovoi travostoi sposobov ego ispol’zovaniya [The impact of use methods on meadow grassland]. Trudy Botanicheskogo instituta imeni V. L. Komarova Akademii nauk SSSR. Ser. 3, Geobotanika [Transactions of the V. L. Komarov Botanical Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Ser. 3, Geobotany]. 1963, is. 14, p 39—103. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref43"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">12. Makarevich V. N. Ob izuchenii prirosta i opada nadzemnoi chasti lugovykh rastitel’nykh soobshchestv [On the study of growth and fall of the aboveground part of meadow plant communities]. Botanicheskii zhurnal, 1968, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1160—1169. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref44"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">13. Makarevich V. N., Dzhalilova A. O., Ignatenko I. V., Kirillova V. P., Skalon I. S. Eksperimental’noe izuchenie reaktsii lugovogo soobshchestva na razlichnye formy vozdeistviya (vazhneishie itogi) [Experimental study of the response of meadow communities to various forms of impact (key results)]. Problemy botaniki, 1968, vol. 10, pp. 193—213. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref45"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">14. Onipchenko V. G., Bostanova F. S., Tokareva O. A., Makarov M. I., Elumeeva T. G., Akhmetzhanova A. A., Tekeev D. K., Malysheva T. I., Kadulin M. S. Vliyanie vyzhiganiya vetoshi na al’piiskie pestroovsyanitsevye luga Severo-Zapadnogo Kavkaza [Impact of litter burning on alpine Festuca varia grasslands of the Northwestern Caucasus]. Zhurnal obshchei biologii, 2023, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 313—326. DOI: 10.31857/S004445962304005X. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref46"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">15. Ponyatovskaya V. M. Uchet obiliya i osobennosti razmeshcheniya vidov v estestvennykh rastitel’nykh soobshchestvakh [Accounting for the abundance and distribution of species in natural plant communities]. Polevaya geobotanika [Field Geobotany]. Moscow, Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1964, vol. 3, pp. 209—289. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref47"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">16. Ronginskaya A. V. Dinamicheskie protsessy v lugovykh fitotsenozakh [Dynamic processes in meadow phytocenoses]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1988. 160 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref48"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">17. Semenova-Tyan-Shanskaya A. M. Nakoplenie i rol’ podstilki v travyanykh soobshchestvakh [Accumulation and role of litter in grass communities]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1977. 191 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref49"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">18. Snegireva E. V. Dinamika sostava i produktivnosti rastenii pri raznykh rezhimakh zapovedovaniya lugovoi stepi [Dynamics of plant composition and productivity under different meadow-steppe conservation regimes]. Dinamika bioty v ekosistemakh Tsentral’noi lesostepi [Dynamics of biota in Central forest-steppe ecosystems]. Moscow, AN SSSR Publ., 1986, pp. 185—199. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref50"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">19. Tikhodeeva M. Yu., Lebedeva V. Kh., Panfilovskaya K. A. Klassifikatsiya tipov zarastaniya sukhodol’nykh lugov [Classification of overgrowth types in dry meadows]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Gosudarstvennogo Nikitskogo botanicheskogo sada [Collection of Scientific Papers of the State Nikitsky Botanical Garden], 2016, vol. 143, pp. 242—248. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref51"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">20. Bonanomi G., Idbella M., Abd-ElGawad A. M., Motti R., Ippolito F., Santorufo L., Adamo P., Agrelli D., De Marco A., Maisto G., Zotti M. Impact of prescribed burning, mowing and abandonment on a Mediterranean grassland: A 5-year multi-kingdom comparison. The Science of the Total Environment, 2022, vol. 834, no. 4, art. 155442. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155442.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref52"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">21. Cherednichenko O., Borodulina V. Biodiversity of herbaceous vegetation in abandoned and managed sites under protection regime: a case study in the Central Forest Reserve, NW Russia. Hacquetia. 2018. Vol. 17, N 1. P. 35—59. DOI: 10.1515/hacq-2017-0015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref53"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">22. Cherednichenko O. V., Gavrilova T., Borodulina V., Zhelezova S., Elumeeva T. G. Structure of aboveground phytomass of abandoned and managed mesic meadows in the forest zone: a case study from the Central Forest Reserve, Russia. Botany Letters, 2021, vol. 168, pp. 297—309. DOI: 10.1080/23818107.2021.1884899.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref54"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">23. Hansson M., Fogelfors H. Management of a semi-natural grassland; results from a 15-year-old experiment in southern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2000, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31—38. DOI: 10.2307/3236772.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref55"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">24. Jernej I., Bohner A., Walcher R., Hussain R. I., Arnberger A., Zaller J. G., Frank T. Impact of land-use change in mountain semi-dry meadows on plants, litter decomposition and earthworms. Web Ecology, 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 53—63. DOI: 10.5194/we-19-53-2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref56"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">25. Lednev S., Semenkov I., Koroleva T. Comparison on effect of mowing and spring burning on the occurrence of grassland plants in Western Siberia (preliminary results). E3S Web of Conferences, 2023, vol. 463, no. 02017. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202346302017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref57"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">26. Losvik M. H. Plant species diversity in an old, traditionally managed hay meadow compared to abandoned hay meadows in Southwest Norway. Nordic Journal of Botany, 1999, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 473—487. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1999.tb01231.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref58"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">27. Öckinger E., Eriksson A. K., Smith H. G. Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants. Biological Conservation, 2006, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 291—300. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref59"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">28. Pruchniewicz D. Abandonment of traditionally managed mesic mountain meadows affects plant species composition and diversity. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2017, vol. 20, pp. 10—18. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.01.006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref60"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">29. Vassilev K., Pedashenko H., Nikolov S. C., Apostolova I., Dengler J. Effect of land abandonment on the vegetation of upland semi-natural grasslands in the Western Balkan Mts., Bulgaria. Plant Biosystems, 2011, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 654—665. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2011.601337.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref61"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">30. Wahlman H., Milberg P. Management of semi-natural grassland vegetation: evaluation of a long-term experiment in southern Sweden. Annales Botanici Fennici, 2002, vol. 39, pp. 159—166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref62"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">31. World Flora Online. Available at: http://www.worldfloraonline.org/ Accessed: 01.10.2025.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
