Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal. 2026. № 1 (57). P. 42—56

 

BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES

Original article

UDC 581.9(470.56)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32516/2303-9922.2026.57.3

Segetal Communities of the North-West Part of the Orenburg Region

Azaliya A. Kamaletdinova, Postgraduate Student
South Ural Botanical Garden-Institute, UFRC RAS, Ufa, Russia, azaliyakam17@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1856-5353

Sergey M. Yamalov, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Chief Researcher
South Ural Botanical Garden-Institute, UFRC RAS, Ufa, Russia, yamalovsm@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-522X

Gulnaz R. Khasanova, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher
Bashkir Research Institute of Agriculture UFRC RAS Ufa, Russia, gulnazrim@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7355-1450

Yaroslav M. Golovanov, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher
South Ural Botanical Garden-Institute, UFRC RAS, Ufa, Russia, jaro1986@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4790-8900

 

Abstract

A geobotanical study of weed-field communities in the steppe zone of the northwestern Orenburg Region, with focus on grain and row crops, was conducted during the 2024 field season. The study identified a new variant of the Echinochloa crus-galli — Lactucetum tataricae association within the Eurasian vegetation classification system. The coenoflora of the studied communities was noted to be rich in invasive species, accounting for 20% of the total number of species. A total of 11 invasive species from the preliminary “black list” of Orenburg Region flora were identified. Species with the highest activity and consistency are Amaranthus blitoides, Amaranthus retroflexus, Carduus acanthoides, Echinochloa crus-galli, Euphrosyne xanthiifolia, Lactuca serriola, Setaria viridis. The ordination analysis revealed that the Echinochloa crus-galli variant represents the most mesophytic community of segetal vegetation in the Orenburg Region. The communities deserve close attention and monitoring of their spread as field weeds with a high proportion of invasive and quarantined species.

Key words

Weed-field vegetation, segetal communities, syntaxonomy, invasive species, Southern Urals, Orenburg region.

Acknowledgments: The work was carried out within the framework of the state task No. 075-03-2022-001 on the topic “Biodiversity of natural systems and plant resources of Russia: assessment of the state and monitoring of dynamics, problems of conservation, reproduction, increase and rational use” of the South Ural Botanical Garden Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences dated 14.01.2022

For citation:

Kamaletdinova A. A., Yamalov S. M., Khasanova G. R., Golovanov Y. M. Segetal Communities of the North-West Part of the Orenburg Region. Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal, 2026, no. 1 (57), pp. 42—56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32516/2303-9922.2026.57.3.

The full text of the article PDF (Russian)

 

References

1. Abramova L. M., Golovanov Ya. M. Materialy k “Chernoi knige flory Orenburgskoi oblasti” [Materials to the “Black book of flora of the Orenburg region”]. Rossiiskii zhurnal biologicheskikh invazii — Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2023, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2—15. DOI: 10.35885/1996-1499-16-4-02-15. (In Russian)
2. Abramova L. M., Golovanov Ya. M., Khaziakhmetov R. M. Invazionnye rasteniya Orenburgskoi oblasti [Invasive plants in the Orenburg region]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta — Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University, 2017, no. 1 (63), pp. 184—186. (In Russian)
3. Agroklimaticheskie resursy Orenburgskoi oblasti [Agroclimatic resources of the Orenburg region]. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 1971. 120 p. (In Russian)
4. Baranova O. G., Tret’yakova A. S., Luneva N. N., Zverev A. A., Kondratkov P. V., Terekhina T. A., Khasanova G. R., Yamalov S. M., Lebedeva M. V., Bagrikova N. A. Osobennosti biomorfologicheskoi i geograficheskoi struktur segetal’nykh flor ryada regionov Rossii [Features of the biomorphological and geographic structure of segetal floras in a number of regions in Russia]. Trudy po prikladnoi botanike, genetike i selektsii — Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding, 2024, vol. 185, no. 4, pp. 209—220. DOI: 10.30901/2227-8834-2024-4-209-220. (In Russian)
5. Vinogradova Yu. K., Maiorov S. R., Khorun L. V. Chernaya kniga flory Srednei Rossii (Chuzherodnye vidy rastenii v ekosistemakh Srednei Rossii) [Black book of the flora of Central Russia (Alien plant species in the ecosystems of Central Russia)]. Moscow, GEOS Publ., 2009. 494 p. (In Russian)
6. Sokolov A. A., Chibilev A. A., Rudneva O. S., Barbazyuk E. V. (et al.) Geograficheskii atlas Orenburgskoi oblasti [Geographical atlas of the Orenburg region]. Orenburg, In-t stepi UrO RAN, RGO Publ., 2020. 160 p. (In Russian)
7. Zharasov Sh. U. Povilika polevaya: kak s nei borot’sya [Cuscuta campestris Yunck: how to control it]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii, 2014, no. 8, pp. 27—29. (In Russian)
8. Kirtaeva T. N., Khatuntseva A. Yu. Rasprostranenie poviliki polevoi (Cuscuta campestris L.) v posevakh soi na territorii Primorskogo kraya [Distribution of the field midge (Cuscuta campestris L.) in soybean crops in the Primorsky territory]. Agrarnyi vestnik Primor’ya, 2021, no. 2 (22), pp. 13—17. (In Russian)
9. Lebedeva M. V., Yamalov S. M., Korolyuk A. Yu., Golovanov Ya. M., Zolotareva N. V., Drap M. N. Fitotsenoteka travyanoi rastitel’nosti Yuzhnogo Urala kak instrument analiza i monitoringa bioraznoobraziya [Phytocoenoteca of the Southern Urals’ herbaceous vegetation as a tool for biodiversity analysis and monitoring]. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v issledovanii bioraznoobraziya: materialy III Natsional’noi konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem, posvyashch. 100-letiyu so dnya rozhd. akad. RAN P. L. Gorchakovskogo [Information technologies in biodiversity research. Proceed. of the III National conf. with International participation, dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of academician of the Russian academy of sciences P. L. Gorchakovsky]. Yekaterinburg, Gumanitarnyi un-t Publ., 2020, pp. 349—352. (In Russian)
10. Makarenko A. A., Bardak N. I., Filipenko N. N. Karantinnye sornye rasteniya: rasprostranenie, vredonosnost’ i mery bor’by [Quarantine weeds: distribution, harmfulness, and control measures]. Krasnodar, Kubanskii gos. agrar. un-t im. I. T. Trubilina Publ., 2018. 81 p. (In Russian)
11. Malyshev L. I. Floristicheskoe raionirovanie na osnove kolichestvennykh priznakov [Floristic zoning based on quantitative traits]. Botanicheskii zhurnal, 1973, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 1581—1602. (In Russian)
12. Startsev V. I., Livanskaya G. A., Kulikov M. A. Opyt vozdelyvaniya podsolnechnika v usloviyakh zarazhennosti pochvy zarazikhoi (Orobanche cumana Wallr.) [Experience with sunflower cultivation in soil infested with broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.)]. Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki, 2017, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 85—89. (In Russian)
13. Khasanova G. R., Yamalov S. M., Drap M. N., Shakirzyanov A. Kh. Segetal’nye soobshchestva s uchastiem invazivnykh vidov na yugo-vostoke Orenburgskoi oblasti [Weed communities with alien plant species on the south-east area of the Orenburg region]. Samarskii nauchnyi vestnik — Samara Journal of Science, 2021, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 122—128. DOI: 10.17816/snv2021103118. (In Russian)
14. Khasanova G. R., Yamalov S. M., Kamaletdinova A. A. Invazionnye vidy segetal’nykh soobshchestv Yuzhnogo i Srednego Urala [Invasive species of segetal communities of the Southern and Middle Urals]. Rossiiskii zhurnal biologicheskikh invazii — Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2024, no. 1, pp. 133—145. DOI: 10.35885/1996-1499-17-1-133-145. (In Russian)
15. Khasanova G. R., Yamalov S. M., Lebedeva M. V. Segetal’naya rastitel’nost’ Yuzhnogo Urala: soyuz Scleranthion annui (Kruseman et Vlieger 1939) Sissingh in Westhoff et al. 1946 [Segetal vegetation of the Southern Urals. Alliance Scleranthion annui (Kruseman et Vlieger 1939) Sissingh in Westhoff et al. 1946]. Rastitel’nost’ Rossii — Vegetation of Russia, 2018, no. 34, pp. 120—137. DOI: 10.31111/vegrus/2018.34.120. (In Russian)
16. Khasanova G. R., Yamalov S. M., Lebedeva M. V., Golovanov Ya. M. O novoi assotsiatsii segetal’noi rastitel’nosti Yuzhnogo Urala [New association of weed vegetation in the Southern Ural]. Samarskii nauchnyi vestnik — Samara Journal of Science, 2019, vol. 8, no. 4 (29), pp. 97—103. DOI: 10.24411/2309-4370-2019-14117. (In Russian)
17. Khasanova G. R., Yamalov S. M., Lebedeva M. V., Shigapov Z. Kh. Segetal’naya rastitel’nost’ Yuzhnogo Urala: soyuzy Caucalidion Tx. Ex von Rochow 1951 i Lactucion tataricae Rudakov in Mirkin et al., 1985 [Segetal vegetation of the South Urals: the alliances Caucalidion Tx. ex von Rochow 1951 and Lactucion tataricae Rudakov in Mirkin et al. 1985]. Rastitel’nost’ Rossii — Vegetation of Russia, 2019, no. 37, pp. 118—134. DOI: 10.31111/vegrus/2019.37.118. (In Russian)
18. Yamalov S. M., Khasanova G. R., Kamaletdinova A. A., Golovanov Ya. M. Novye sintaksony segetal’noi rastitel’nosti Orenburgskoi oblasti [New syntaxons of segetal vegetation of the Orenburg region]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal — Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal, 2024, no. 3 (51), pp. 112—125. Available at: http://vestospu.ru/archive/2024/articles/51/7_51_2024.pdf. DOI: 10.32516/2303-9922.2024.51.7. (In Russian)
19. Yamalov S. M., Khasanova G. R., Lebedeva M. V., Korchev V. V. O novykh segetal’nykh soobshchestvakh posevov podsolnechnika v Orenburgskoi oblasti [New segetal communities of sunflower crops in the Orenburg region]. Samarskii nauchnyi vestnik — Vegetation of Russia, 2021, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 124—130. DOI: 10.17816/snv2021102119. (In Russian)
20. Hennekens S. M., Schaminée J. H. J. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2001, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 589—591. DOI: 10.2307/3237010.
21. Mucina L., Bültmann H., Dierßen K., Theurillat J.-P., Raus T., Čarni A., Šumberová K., Willner W., Dengler J., Gavilán García R., Chytrý M., Hájek M., Di Pietro R., Iakushenko D., Pallas J., Daniëls F. J. A., Bergmeier E., Santos Guerra A., Ermakov N., Valachovič M., Schaminée J. H. J., Lysenko T., Didukh Ya. P., Pignatti S., Rodwell J. S., Capelo J., Weber H. E., Solomeshch A., Dimopoulos P., Aguiar C., Hennekens S. M., Tichý L. Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Applied Vegetation Science, 2016, vol. 19, suppl. 1, pp. 3—264. DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12257.
22. Plants of the World Online. Available at: https://powo.science.kew.org Accessed: 10.10.2025.
23. Roleček J., Tichý L., Zelený D., Chytrý M. Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2009, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 596—602. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01062.x.
24. Ter Braak C. J. F., Šmilauer P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). New York, Microcomputer Power Publ., 2002. 500 p.
25. Tichý L. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2002, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 451—453.
26. Vegetace České republiky. 2. Ruderální, plevelová, skalní a suťová vegetace. M. Chytrý (ed.). Praha, Academia Publ., 2009. 524 p.
27. Weber H. E., Moravec J., Theourillat D.-P. International Code of phytosociological nomenclature. 3rd ed. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2000, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 739—768. DOI: 10.2307/3236580.
28. Westhoff V., Van Der Maarel E. The Braun-Blanquet Approach. Classification of Plant Communities. Ed. by R. H. Whittaker. Springer, Dordrecht, 1978, vol 5-1. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_9.